If you’re asking whether tuna is higher in protein than chicken, the short answer is: usually no. In most common comparisons, chicken breast has slightly more protein than tuna by weight and often by serving too.

That said, the gap is small, and the exact answer depends on the type of tuna, the cut of chicken, and whether you’re comparing cooked, canned, or raw portions.

Quick answer: chicken usually wins, but not by much

A typical cooked chicken breast is one of the highest-protein foods you can eat. USDA FoodData Central lists roasted chicken breast, meat only, at about 31 g of protein per 100 g. Many tuna products are close behind, but usually a bit lower; for example, canned tuna in water, drained, is commonly around 25–29 g of protein per 100 g depending on the type.

So if you compare equal weights, chicken breast is generally higher in protein than tuna. If you compare a whole can of tuna to a smaller chicken portion, however, tuna may end up giving you more total protein for that meal.

Why the numbers change so much

The protein total depends on more than just the animal. Tuna varies by species and preparation: light tuna, albacore tuna, fresh tuna steaks, and canned tuna all have slightly different nutrition profiles. Chicken also changes based on the cut and whether the skin is included. Skinless breast is leanest and highest in protein per calorie; thigh and wing meat usually have a bit less protein per gram and more fat.

Cooking method matters too because water loss concentrates nutrients. That means cooked weights often look higher in protein per 100 g than raw weights, even though the total protein in the original piece of meat has not magically increased.

Protein quality, calories, and what matters for your goals

Both tuna and chicken are complete proteins, meaning they provide all essential amino acids. For muscle building, fat loss, or simply meeting daily protein needs, either can be an excellent choice.

If you want the most protein for the fewest calories, skinless chicken breast is hard to beat. Tuna is also very efficient, but it often brings a bit less protein per 100 g and may come with more sodium if canned. Tuna has another tradeoff: because some tuna can be higher in mercury, it’s smart to follow FDA and EPA guidance on how often you eat certain types, especially for pregnant people and young children.

Best way to choose between tuna and chicken

Pick chicken breast when you want the highest protein density and a versatile base for meals. Pick tuna when you want convenience, a no-cook protein source, or a different flavor profile. Neither is universally better; the best option is the one that fits your schedule, appetite, and overall diet.

If you’re tracking macros, the big practical difference is usually portion size rather than the food itself. A 4-ounce serving of either food can provide roughly 25–35 g of protein, which is enough to make a strong protein-focused meal.

Tips

Sources

  1. FoodData Central — USDA
  2. Protein in the Diet — CDC
  3. Protein quality and digestibility in foods — PubMed

Frequently Asked Questions

Is tuna higher in protein than chicken breast?

Usually no. Chicken breast is typically slightly higher in protein per 100 g than tuna.

Is tuna or chicken better for muscle gain?

Both work well. Chicken breast is usually a little higher in protein and lower in calories per serving, but tuna is also a strong lean protein choice.

Does canned tuna have as much protein as fresh tuna?

Often it’s similar by weight, but the exact amount depends on the tuna type and whether it’s packed in water or oil.

Which has more protein per calorie?

Skinless chicken breast is usually one of the most protein-dense choices. Tuna is also lean, but chicken breast often comes out ahead.

Know your macros without the math

Snap a photo of your meal and Fitnit reads the calories and macros for you. Free during beta.